Rundeck Rundeck Development → Rundeck 1.3

Comments and changes to this ticket

• 

  Alex-SF December 17th, 2010 @ 08:41 AM

  Can we just begin by cutting down the existing project.dtd to just node and setting tags?

• You flagged this item as spam.
  

  Deleted User December 17th, 2010 @ 10:47 AM

  Is it possible to drop the DTD all together, or at least not make it a requirement of existing in the document when it's read by RunDeck? It can be optional. If it's present then use it?

• 

  Greg Schueler December 17th, 2010 @ 10:48 AM

  we can do both

• 

  Alex-SF December 17th, 2010 @ 11:02 AM

  I'm all for dumping the DTD decl for the resources.xml doc. Not sure if that will have an annoying consequence elsewhere in the code base.

• 

  Greg Schueler December 17th, 2010 @ 11:05 AM

  we can use dtd declaration for our own generated xml, but not require it on
  input

• You flagged this item as spam.
  

  Deleted User December 17th, 2010 @ 01:55 PM

  • Milestone order changed from “15” to “0”

  I like that option...

  If there is an error and we suspect that it's format related, we can urge them validate their documents using the DTD.

• 

  Alex-SF December 29th, 2010 @ 05:50 PM

  • Milestone cleared.
  • Milestone order changed from “11” to “0”
• 

  Alex-SF January 14th, 2011 @ 07:28 AM

  • Milestone set to “Rundeck 1.2”
  • Milestone order changed from “18” to “0”
• 

  Alex-SF January 14th, 2011 @ 12:10 PM

  • Title changed from “Refactor resources.xml model” to “Refactor resource model definition”
• 

  Alex-SF February 1st, 2011 @ 11:45 AM

  • Milestone cleared.
  • Milestone order changed from “1” to “0”
• 

  Alex-SF March 17th, 2011 @ 02:55 PM

  • Milestone set to “Rundeck 1.3”
  • Milestone order changed from “29” to “0”

  User defined metadata could be defined in an "attributes" sub element. Eg

  <node name="mynode">
      <attributes
        attr1="val1" ... attrN="valN" 
      />
  </node>
  

  A more verbose method could be

   <node name="mynode">
      <attribute
        name="attr1" value="val1"
      />
   </node>
  

• You flagged this item as spam.
  

  Deleted User March 17th, 2011 @ 02:57 PM

  Yaml version?

• 

  Greg Schueler March 17th, 2011 @ 02:58 PM

  My yaml thought is just to allow arbitrary entries in the data map:

  mynode:
    name: mynode
    hostname: blah
    arbitrary: value
  

• 

  Greg Schueler March 17th, 2011 @ 02:59 PM

  • Assigned user set to “Greg Schueler”
• 

  Greg Schueler March 17th, 2011 @ 02:59 PM

  • State changed from “new” to “open”
• 

  Greg Schueler March 18th, 2011 @ 10:26 AM

  other options for the xml format. i will implement all of these to provide some variety in input syntax:

   <node name="mynode">
      <attribute name="attr1">value</attribute>
   </node>
  

  and

   <node name="mynode" attr1="value">
   </node>
  

• You flagged this item as spam.
  

  Deleted User March 21st, 2011 @ 11:14 AM

  (from [5c5508dc5a0d6bae94c5b2b0dd780ac854028592]) Refactor node/resources to add attributes [#114] https://github.com/dtolabs/rundeck/commit/5c5508dc5a0d6bae94c5b2b0d...

• You flagged this item as spam.
  

  Deleted User March 21st, 2011 @ 12:07 PM

  (from [163e4d06710f6bd15dc236cb1f250786dec1f6dd]) Update documentation for resources v1.3 [#114] https://github.com/dtolabs/rundeck/commit/163e4d06710f6bd15dc236cb1...

• 

  Greg Schueler April 21st, 2011 @ 03:09 PM

  • State changed from “open” to “resolved”